Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Essay 3-Will Kim

Many people may think that paper exams, written exams, and the tests that reveals only one’s diligence and brain can evaluate one’s value. Well, I believe that this world is now shifting its gears into a more globalized standard.
Currently, as this world is rapidly changing and becoming more globalized, many universities, companies, and employees are demanding not only technology, but also an ability to interact with one another. In another words, this world is demanding a global leadership. Some examples of global leaderships are the followings: international voluntary service, experience in the foreign country, linguistic abilities, and so on. To give a good example of why this world is becoming globalized, I will be specifically talking about universities, companies, and employers.
First, university entrance exam, which only tested the student’s comprehension of only studying, is now decreased. This is due to the fact that, people these days now realize that only evaluating one’s value (I know it is kinda awkward to use this word in meaning to human, but I’ll just use it) by the outcome of exam score was not a great idea. So, in order to fill in the deficiency of formal evaluation standards, meeting the demands of the things this world wants was the only answer. Test, which was a played a large role, is now in the minor league and extracurricular activities such as science competitions, other tests, math competitions, and recommendations stepped up in the stage. So in conclusion, written examination will be puffed into written exam plus oral test plus extracurricular activities.
Second, companies and employers want a smart and globalized leader. Viewing from the perspective of the employer, a smart employer would want to hire those who are excellent not only the ones that are brainy, but also those who are able to interact with the world. Interacting with the world means linguistic fluency, eloquent speaking, experience with an outsider, and so on.
Lastly, looking from a larger spectrum, this nation is looking for those who are really able to cooperate internationally. Examples are president, diplomats, congressman, and ect. Because handling a national matter must be extremely cautious and careful, the ones that are holding the powers are in great responsibilities. Must not lose, but must not destroy the relationships with one another.
I strongly support these upcoming ideas because they seem more realistic if we look at the needs of this world. There are may be some people who just don’t do well on written exams. Giving them a chance of more open doors might lead one’s school or nation to find the ones that needs to be where they really should be. Evaluating one’s value by a paper is not logical. It is pathetic. Well maybe they can figure out who is smart or not, but they will never be able to figure out who is suited for something by some papers. I believe that written exam exists because it is there to evaluate the most basic thing: diligence. If one cannot even prove that he or she is a diligent worker, then how could they be able to work under the standard that demands more great diligence and responsibilities? It just does not make any sense!
In conclusion, due to the rapid changing of this world, I am standing up for the fact that global interactions and extracurricular activities are just as important as paper exams.

8 comments:

  1. Will,

    My question for you is if the value of a written test is decreasing because people are realizing this is not the summation of a whole person, then what else is? In other words, what is a person? Is it just mind? Soul? Heart? Body? And from your definition of person, how may we then assess every part of a person for our schools, careers, and social involvement?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Will I support the idea that it's hard to evaluate one's value just by the paper exam. And I am happy to hear that the world support this idea!!
    What kind of activity can evaluate one's leadership?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Summary.
    In this essay, will is arguing the ability to live as a global citizen is much as important as diligence in this rapidly changing world because itself is requesting it. Also he says that evaluating one person’s value by paper only is ridiculous. He is supporting his argument with following three reasons.
    First, university is requesting extracurricular activities such as essay test or math competition or plenty of volunteering time rather than just examining on college entrance exam.
    Second, in globalized society, companies are demanding the employers who can interact with a myriad type of people.
    Lastly, in a bigger scale, nation needs public officials who are good at diplomacy.

    Reflection.
    Will’s essay is logical and well structured. There is not many things I can mention about this essay.
    But in my personal opinion, I was curious about the reason why will had to choose this topic.
    This argument was very ordinary and common. While reading this essay, I felt like I’m experiencing déjà vu like reading model essays in my past. In addition, I wanted his argument to be clear. I could understand what he was saying but I was not excited about it because I didn’t feel that he was arguing his evident position or opinion with passion.
    Nevertheless, still I assess his essay highly in many ways.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow, your essay is very logical. I strongly agree with your essay! I like your idea that global leadership is very important. What do you think about 샘물? Is it appropriate with your opinion?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think your essay depicts the biggest educational problem in Korea. Deciding one's value with paper score is ridiculous, as you mentioned. Though it was a bit hard to follow, still I enjoyed your essay.
    I'm curious about your opinion for this. Nowadays, many universities noticed their problem just as what you mentioned on your essay. But though some of them are taking it to action, many universities concern about the side effects of the act. What do you think they should do in order to overcome this?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh! I found a grammar error! Dictionary says that there no 'and' in front of 'etc'. Okay? You got it? Also it is 'etc', not 'ect'.
    OK. I agree with your idea that written exam evaluates our diligence.
    Why do not government change the name '수능' to 'Evaluating diligence test'?

    ReplyDelete
  7. I couldn't possibily agree more. Korea should not depend on only their technique and knowledge matter.
    You mentioned 'Giving them a chance of more open doors might lead one’s school or nation to find the ones that needs to be where they really should be.' What kind of grading program would you make if you had a ability to control the chance?

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like your essay about how we should get ready for the future:) and it really taught me. I agree with the idea that you think test is also needed because it is the way that can prove the basic things. I think you know a lot of what things we should do for the future and what the world wants. So here is the question! What kind of things are you doing right now to get ready or to get to those standards? Like international voluntary service, experience in the foreign country, linguistic abilities, and so on..

    ReplyDelete